Okay so here are my preliminary thoughts on two paragraphs. Not finalized just some thoughts put together so far.
To begin with, this political carton appeals to the strategy
of logos. In this picture the creator of the cartoon hopes to appeal to ones
logic by using the image of the women voting. The woman in this picture seems
to appear younger in age. She is wearing very skimpy clothing. She has a facial
piercing and her hair looks unkempt and wild. She also has many different
tattoos. Overall this woman has a punk rock look to her and shows as if she has
interest in music. The cartoon also
displays the woman voting on the American idol part of the ballot while leaving
the two government offices still blank. This cartoon conveys that by putting
the American idol ballot on the government election ballots that many people
who are not interested in things such as government offices will be more likely
to come and vote if there is a point of interest for them being there such as a
reality TV show like American idol.
Additionally,
the creator of this cartoon uses the appeal of pathos to appeal to ones
emotions. In this cartoon the woman goes straight to the American idol ballot
rather than voting on what should be more important first such as the
government election. In the 2008
presidential election alone only 49.3 - 54.5 percent of eligible voters ages
18-29 actually voted. To any veteran,
current military personnel, or even ones family of someone who served this
statistics can be quite disheartening.
One id fighting for our freedom to vote and in many countries at the age
of 18 the right to vote is unheard of, whereas here in the in the unites states
we have that privilege and every one in two citizens in that age group don’t
take advantage of it.
Really good point about where the voter goes first in your second paragraph--the question I have about that is whether the 49 % voting for the age range you specify is higher or lower than previous elections? The answer to that might help you to see some of the other arguments in the cartoon. Also, what exactly is reasonable about the claim the cartoonist is making--is it a common sense claim about how people get interested in something? How do people get interested in things?
ReplyDelete